The Paradox of Choice
The Paradox of Choice
Ver mensaje de Juan SuchBarry Schwartz, a psychology professor at Swarthmore College, is the author of ";The Paradox of Choice,"; an interesting book just released in paperback. In a recent interview with Mark Hurst (a business consultant focused on improving the online customer experience) the author comments the following:
Q - What is the ";paradox of choice";?
Everyone agrees that having choice is better than not having choice.
It seems evident that if choice is good, then more choice is better.
The paradox is that this ";obvious"; truth isn’t true. It turns out
that a point can be reached where, with more choice, people are
worse off.
People can’t ignore options - they have to pay attention to them. If
they make a choice, is there another choice would have been better?
There’s more effort put into making decisions, and less in enjoying
them. What’s nagging is the possibility that, if they had chosen
differently, they could have gotten something better.
Here’s a story from my own experience. While vacationing in this
little town on the Oregon coast, I went to buy wine for dinner. I
had to buy the wine from a store that had only five varieties, so I
picked one. It wasn’t great wine, but no one cared - what can you
expect when there are only five options? In Manhattan, there are
20,000 options, so it’s reasonable to expect that you’ll find
something close to perfect. But even if you find one that’s much
better than anything in that Oregon store, you end up disappointed -
because your expectations can only go up with all those choices.";
Sometimes I have the feeling that, yes, there are too many options in the world of wine. Have you the same feeling?
Re: The Paradox of Choice
Ver mensaje de Juan SuchHi Joan,
Perhaps you are right. Your comments remind me about chess, as you know, when there is only one move, it is sure it is the right/best one... the difficulty comes when there are so many ’equivalent’ options. Then, I do think in both chess and wines, the personal taste will always guide the final decision. What do you think?
Salut!
Joan
What do you mean?
Ver mensaje de JoanFThere is only one cheese? Which one did you have in mind?
Re: What do you mean?
Ver mensaje de GastronautaSorry if I misunderstood you... I meant ’Chess’ the game, you know, the ’ajedrez’....
I don’t know if this is the point.
Please forgive me if I made a mistake.
Salut!
Joan
Re: What do you mean?
Ver mensaje de JoanFMy apologies, I was just pulling your leg... ;^)
Re: The Paradox of Choice
Ver mensaje de JoanFInteresting analogy. But as chess, along with wine, is one of my great loves, I should point out that, quite often when there is only one logical move you can make, you are in a loosing position.
Re: The Paradox of Choice
Ver mensaje de WaltZalenskiOf course, you are right.... that was the joke! to have a lot of options is good, in my humble opinion. Either in chess and wine, the many options is what makes the game (the wine) interesting.
Salut!
PD: I see some chess lovers around here (as you, Juan Such and myself - but I’m really bad- , and somebody else on the spanish side). We may gather together to drink wine and play chess... !
Re: The Paradox of Choice
Ver mensaje de JoanFDrinking wine and playing chess is a double game. There’s the alcohol tolerance and the proper ability at chess. It’d be fun to play before AND after drinking and see whether the results change dramatically...