- Comentarios esperpénticos.
- Entregados los premios a los mejores vinos y destilados vínicos de España
- Cata de Wine Up Tour en Albacete
- Vinos Blancos. La Selección de Fenavin trás el tunel
- El mejor vino blanco de España
- ¿Cuál es el mejor restaurante de Valencia ahora mismo?
- Los vinos Utiel Requena galardonados en el Concours Mondial de Bruxelles 2013
- Raíces
- Homenaje a la mejor tradición arrocera y presentación de Wikipaella
- ¡Mi sacacorchos chupa!
Save the duero initiative
Respuestas: 6
Nice purpose but not really good expectatiosn… It seems than the decision has already been made
Hi Paco,
As a wine lover, I see it as a necessary moral support to the affected wineries.
Guiri
Although I`m foreigner I support it.It´s is heritage of the whole world and it`s a pity if this outstanding terroir be destroyed.
Just follow the money trail and figure out who got paid off to use that outdated 1991 map and you will understand why this illogical route has been chosen instead of the northern route, which will wipe out a lot of wheat fields on the paramo.
I deplore widening the southern route, but as far as the gas fumes destroying the vines any more than N-122 does already (or Route 29 in Napa Valley), both with often slow moving traffic do, I don’t see that. Moving traffic to the north to alleviate such pollution, of course, but a fast highway is not going to create more pollution than one that has deisel trucks (a crime in themselves) moving through at a slower pace.