- Restaurante Casa Manolo: Otro serio aspirante a la guía roja Michelin
- Recomendación de vinos tintos extranjeros
- Vinos para el verano
- Egon Müller Scharzhof: Vertical 2007-2010
- Cómo cocinar el pescado de roca
- Omar Jayam, Poesía y Vino
- ¿Qué es lo que esperamos de un restaurante?
- Amor por la Ginebra. Un aplauso a los supermercados NOVAVENDA de Girona
- Sushi, ¿por qué sigue de moda? - recetas de cocina
- Un tapón de corcho de 2000 años, recuperado del fondo marino
Novedades de Verema
Lote especial de Bodegas MurviedroVerema ha seleccionado un lote de Murviedro Colección por solo 29€
Nuevo lote de junio del Club VeremaTe presentamos el nuevo lote del Club Verema. Un lote muy especial, monográfico de la bodega Marqués de Riscal con un descuento de cerca del 45%
Save the duero initiative
Respuestas: 6
Nice purpose but not really good expectatiosn… It seems than the decision has already been made
Hi Paco,
As a wine lover, I see it as a necessary moral support to the affected wineries.
Guiri
Although I`m foreigner I support it.It´s is heritage of the whole world and it`s a pity if this outstanding terroir be destroyed.
Just follow the money trail and figure out who got paid off to use that outdated 1991 map and you will understand why this illogical route has been chosen instead of the northern route, which will wipe out a lot of wheat fields on the paramo.
I deplore widening the southern route, but as far as the gas fumes destroying the vines any more than N-122 does already (or Route 29 in Napa Valley), both with often slow moving traffic do, I don’t see that. Moving traffic to the north to alleviate such pollution, of course, but a fast highway is not going to create more pollution than one that has deisel trucks (a crime in themselves) moving through at a slower pace.